Judge’s decision on TUPOC eviction from St. Brigid’s not expected until late September

The landlords have been trying to evict The United People of Canada since the middle of August, when they sent a bailiff to tack an eviction notice on the building

Article content

An Ottawa judge has reserved until at least late September a decision in the eviction case against the group that has occupied the former St. Brigid’s church building in Lowertown since the middle of June.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Justice Sally Gomery said she would try to reach a decision soon on the landlord’s application to terminate the lease of The United People of Canada (TUPOC). Her decision is not expected until at least Sept. 27.

Article content

TUPOC’s plans to operate an “embassy” at the deconsecrated church on St. Patrick Street have been opposed by some neighbours and others who are upset about the group’s links to the “Freedom Convoy” movement.

The landlords have been trying to evict TUPOC since the middle of August, when they sent a bailiff to tack an eviction notice on the building.

Landlord Patrick McDonald maintains that TUPOC failed to pay two months’ worth of rent.

TUPOC director William Komer had signed an agreement to purchase the church building, the rectory used as an artists’ studio and an adjacent two-storey office building for $5.95 million, according to documents filed by the landlords.

Advertisement 3

Article content

The purchase agreement included a clause stating TUPOC could lease the church property in the meantime for $5,000 a month. The agreement said the lease could be terminated 30 days after a default in the purchase agreement.

The landlords claim TUPOC failed to make a $100,000 deposit by Aug. 10, putting it in breach of the purchase agreement.

But TUPOC does not agree it is in breach of the purchase agreement. Komer has said the group still wants to go ahead with the sale and, in an affidavit, said as of Sept. 1, TUPOC had the $100,000 deposit available in bank drafts for the landlords.

TUPOC had the “sole discretion” to make the purchase agreement null and void, Komer said in his affidavit, arguing that not paying a fully refundable deposit would not prejudice the seller.

Advertisement 4

Article content

In court on Monday, Justice Gomery questioned that claim, saying it would be a “very unusual deal” if only one side had the right to terminate it.

As for the rent, McDonald said in court he had repeatedly asked Komer for rent money he believed was due in mid-June.

Komer paid one month’s rent on July 24, court heard.

The TUPOC director, in an affidavit, agreed he made a rent payment on July 24. But he argued that he had a verbal agreement with McDonald that no rent was to be paid until July 15, and that it could be submitted a bit late.

A snippet was played in court Monday of a recorded conversation between Komer and McDonald from July 5.

TUPOC’s lawyer, Saron Gebresellassi, attempted to introduce an additional audio recording to the court, but Justice Gomery shut that down.

Advertisement 5

Article content

When the eviction hearings began on Sept. 2, Gomery had ordered that audio recordings had to be transcribed and submitted as affidavits. The deadline for submitting affidavits has passed.

“No, I am not going to let you just file this,” Gomery said.

“We have rules here you know. It’s not just flying by the seat of your pants and you can do whatever you want.”

Earlier, Gomery noted that Komer had failed to file a single email or screenshot with his affidavit.

Gomery said the justice system does not allow “trial by ambush.”

Gebresellassi argued that the relationship between TUPOC and the landlords was mutually beneficial since the church building had been vacant.

McDonald had testified that the group operating the church as a community and arts centre had been losing money because COVID-19 had caused operations to close down.

Advertisement 6

Article content

TUPOC and the landlord had a “stable relationship” that continued to evolve, argued Gebresellassi, who also mentioned the community work TUPOC planned to do.

Justice Gomery said Gebresellassi was presenting “window dressings” and distractions.

“At the end of the day, it’s a commercial lease,” said Gomery. “Explain to me how, legally, your argument holds up because I’m not getting it.”

Gebresellassi also argued that TUPOC and the landlord did have a verbal agreement. She argued that the landlords had not provided a written lease as required in the agreement of purchase.

Gomery repeatedly asked Gebresellassi when the verbal agreement was made and under what terms.

“There is simply no evidence of an oral lease,” said Gomery.

Advertisement 7

Article content

Several protesters and supporters of TUPOC attended Monday’s court hearing.

Deana Sherif said she would continue her protest in the park across the street from St. Brigid’s until TUPOC leaves.

TUPOC says its “embassy” is open to all, however, many of the people who regularly congregate at St. Brigid’s are supporters of the “freedom” movement, which includes a wide assortment of people opposed to COVID-19 vaccines and mandates, public health measures such as the wearing of masks, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Liberal government, and a variety of other causes.

“The company they keep has nothing to do with community building,” argued Sherif.

Gebresellassi, in an interview after the court hearing, said TUPOC is “really important for the country” and that supporters have “put their heart and soul into the embassy.”

Advertisement 1


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.